Ochef reviewers try to consider each book within the context of its stated
or apparent goal it it's meant for novices, we don't compare it to cooking school textbooks.
We make value judgments about certain categories (flavor, production
quality, etc.), but other categories are simply factual (number of
recipes, list price, etc.). The following are the review criteria that might need some explanation:
Ambitions
Intended audience For whom (at what skill level) is this book
primarily written, as stated by the author, publisher, or our best guess?
Apparent goal How comprehensively does the book treat its
subject?
Competition How does this book stack up to other books in
the same category already on the market?
Content
Practical recipes Most people cook fewer than 5 to 10 recipes from any given book. Many books have a number of A-list recipes and are padded out with
lackluster fillers. The rest sit idle. This category is a guess
at the number of good, valid, potential, edible recipes included in the book. We generally cook two or three recipes from
each book we review, so this category represents leap of faith on our part.
# of ingredients On average throughout the book, how many
ingredients (excluding salt, pepper & water) does each recipe
require?
Ingredient hunt Most ingredients in most books are
easily obtainable. On average, does the book reviewed have more than its
share of hard-to-find ingredients? Impossible-to-find ingredients?
Recipe complexity In the context of the book's intended
audience, how complicated are the recipes, on average.
Instructions How clear and comprehensive are the instructions?
Time conscious If the book makes promises about the time
required to complete the recipes, how valid are they on average? (And
are they valid in the context of the book's intended audience?)
Otherwise, on average, are the recipes rational and realistic in terms
of how long they take?
Photos/drawings If the book includes photos and/or drawings,
how much do they contribute to the book's value and utility? Do they
help you cook or are they solely ornamental?
Recipe results How fancy, in general, are the dishes produced by the recipes in this book?
Flavor quotient How do the dishes taste in general, again, based on the dishes we test and our extrapolations for the rest of the book?
Format
Layout Does the layout and format of
the book get in the way of your using it effectively; is it cluttered
and hard to follow? Or does the layout help you follow the recipes?
Legibility Is the type of an adequate
size, or does it get in the way of your cooking?
Production quality How well
made is the book, taking into consideration it's binding. In the case of
books that are available in multiple formats, we are referring only to
the format reviewed.
Value Our assessment of the production
quality of the book, the quality and utility of the recipes, etc.,
relative to the cost of the book, and relative to other books in its
class.
Ease of Use
Page numbers A pet peeve, if ever
there was one, is having a great book with a great table of contents and
a great index, but page numbers hiding in the gutters of the pages,
appearing only once every 10 pages, etc.
Table of contents It is
useful; is it easy to use?
Index quality Stocking suffers
may not need them, but for most cookbooks, an index can make or break
the book.
Page flipping Do recipes
travel from one page to the next, to the next, to the next? Or do many
recipes make use of other referenced recipes that are found on other
pages, and which must be prepared first? In some cases this is
unavoidable, but there have to be limits.
Author
Writing background What is
the author's writing background, and how well written is the book?
Cooking background What are
the author's cooking credentials?
Summary
Overall rating We don't bother to
review books that we consider to be substandard. The others we rate from
fair to excellent.
Ochef Top 100 These are the books
we consider to be the 100 best cookbooks on the market.